Re: TI 92 V.S. HP 48GX, which one is better?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
We don't need high resolutions, just accuracy, with which both are probably
just as accurate.
"This is the most logical route, Captain"
-= Zenon@bbs.nexes.com =-
----------
: From: vett@west.net
: To: Zenon
: Subject: Re: TI 92 V.S. HP 48GX, which one is better?
: Date: November 1, 1996 2:36 PM
:
:
: GTS wrote:
: >
: > In article <551dae$2ut@globe.lynx.bc.ca>, > gUFman < <)> wrote:
: > > Hello, does anyone know which is better? Both are about
: > >US$200, but they seem to be quite different... I don't konw which one
: > >to buy!!! Help!!!
: > >
: > as far as choosing a calculator, it depends on what the use of the
: > calculator will be. the TI-92 is better for calculus and any typing,
but
: > it isn't allowed on standardized tests, and the HP48GX is. plus, the
: > HP48GX supports additional memory and external program cards, as well
as
: > easy access to assembler, system code, and other useful tools. most of
: > the built in functions are slow however, so unless you have easy access
to
: > a computer link and programs, you will agonize as the HP draws graphs
even
: > slower than the TI-82!!
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:
: Uhh Hello -- the graphing of the HP48GX) is at a much higher resolution
: than the
: the TI-8x series. That is why it is "slower". If you lower the
: resolution
: to that of the TI (easily done), the HP graphs at _the_same_speed_ as
: the TIs.
:
: > i chose the HP because it is much more of a computer, with upgradable
: > operating systems (i use java2.8), text editors, and file managers.
like
: > some other response said, though, its all personal preference.
:
: This, my friend, is true 8-)
:
: >
: > --
: > gts@cais.cais.com
:
: --
: Deceive
: Inveigle
: Obfuscate
:
: ------------------------------------
: | Stephen C. Vettorino
: | Irene Katsan-Vettorino
: | <vett@west.net>
: | http://www.west.net/~vett/
: ------------------------------------
:
: "You can sum some of the series some of the time
: and some of the series none of the time ...
: but can you sum some of the series all of the time?"
References: