Re: Unfortunately, fargo


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Unfortunately, fargo



>OK, so we have all been fargo'ed to death.  It occurs to me that we have a
>logical inconsistency in our little group.  Everyone seems to think that the
>TI92 is the greatest thing since sliced bread, yet if you have been
>following the thread, it is unsatisfactory without, dare I say it again, fargo.
>
>If this is really the case, then perhaps the real culprit is Texas
>Instruments, who has chosen not to support assembler language programming on
>the 92.  I have to chuckle at this point because the evil company, HP, has
>always supported it.
>
>Now why is it that you guys aren't putting pressure on TI to support
>assembler, while at the same time you bash the company that does?  Just
>curious.
>
>domroy


I hope this letter doesn't start another TI Rules - HP Sucks battle.


Nathaniel Gibson
ngibson@postoffice.ptd.net


References: