Re: A92: POTM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: POTM
That's a big statement. just because they got the potm votes messed up, doesen't mean they suck.
Noah Medling
http://xp.calc.org/
---- "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
>
> Maybe it can be summed up by saying: ticalc.org sucks.
>
> :P
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Cliff L. Biffle <cbiffle@safety.net>
> To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 5:20 PM
> Subject: Re: A92: POTM
>
>
> >
> >
> > >I recently noticed that the current POTM voting page has the TI-92+
> > >and TI-89 grouped together. Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't
> > >really understand why this should be, as the 89 and 92+ seem not to
> > >be identical to me. If anyone can explain this, please enlighten me.
> >
> > It isn't your ignorance, it's on the part of TICALC.ORG. They've long
> > shown some confusion about the 92+ platform. Some software is 89/92+
> > compatible, but most isn't--keymappings are different, primarily. I think
> > this is along the same lines of why they'll give a headline spot to some
> > new game for the 83 while totally disregarding the release of Prosit
> (which
> > happened a few months back).
> > --Cliff Biffle
> >
> > Optimist: This glass is half full.
> > Pessimist: This glass is half empty.
> > Cynic: They drank my water. Figures.
> > Engineer: The glass should be -half- this size!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
Follow-Ups: