Re: A92: Ti getting slower...


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A92: Ti getting slower...




Ok.
First, I don't use grayscales, and second thing : I tried to disable the
interupts.
I added the piece of code need, I created an interput with no instructions
inside ( is it a good idea ?), and I modified the piece of code where I was
supposed to use the keyboard. I read once that when you disable interupts
you have to access yourself at the keyboard. So I did this, but now it seems
that my prog is blocked.
I mean it doesn't react to any of my keypress. I compared my piece of code
for the keyboard with other program and it looks to be ok.
So where could be the problem ?
Is it that I put nothing in my new interrupt ?

Thanks.

VIVES Fabien
vives@NOSPAMwanadoo.fr
( Enlevez NOSPAM pour me repondre )
( Get NOSPAM off to answer me )..
ICQ : 16950211

-----Message d'origine-----
De : David Kühling <dkuehlin@hell1og.be.schule.de>
À : assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Date : lundi 29 mars 1999 12:14
Objet : Re: A92: Ti getting slower...


>
>
>
>VINCENT VIVES schrieb:
>>
>> ok.
>> Here is another stupid question :
>> I have a prog, with a subroutine. I run my prog. I call my subroutine
 it
>> clears a part of the screen. That's normal ). I do something, else, I
call
>> my subroutine again, and then she runs more slowly than the first time.
Why
>> ?? I really don't see.
>> The weirdest is that if I run my prog, i do some things, then I call my
>> subroutine : it works fast. Then I do the same things, and I call my
>> subroutine again, it's going slow.
>> Does anyone have an idea ?
>>
>
>The only reasons that could cause that speed difference could be
>changes in the interrupt routines. Did you switched off interrupts
>the first time? (if interrupts are disabled the calc will be a little
>faster) Did you use grayscales? They would slow the calc down.
>
>