Re: A92: Assorted '92 stuff

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A92: Assorted '92 stuff
From: Andrew Magness <AndrewM@ev1.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 20:39:48 +0000
In-Reply-To: <199909102040.NAA29559@smtp.asu.edu>
References: <003e01bef4db$841b2820$f2ec1fa8@berry.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


At 01:36 PM 9/10/99 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Wow, the list has been quiet.  School started, eh? :-)
Yeah... It's school....

>
>Here's an issue for the community-at-large.
>
>The 92 and 89 are vastly technically superior to the HP48, and yet the HP48
>has vastly better software support.  I suspect that this is because Hewlett
>Packard offers developer support (which TI doesn't even though they claim
>to) as well as assembly.  We need to get our act in gear, now that GCC is
>available to us (no thanks to TI) and overtake the HP community.  This
>isn't even a matter of competition, because quite frankly I could care less
>which calculator is better--it's just the fact that I want the number of
>games, science programs, and utilities available to a 48 owner.  *grin*
>
I agree!! we now have many of the resources and information avalible to do
this!


>Hey, also, anyone else think that TI has placed themselves into a legally
>compromising position by promising all this assembly support with the '92+
>module (which they DID--the web page had "ASSEMBLY PROGRAMMING" stamped on
>it) and then taking the position that the use of assembly shells voids your
>warranty?  Sounds a lot like false advertising or bait'n'switch to me.

Hehe... ok everyone send $1 to some cheap lawyer so we can all sue TI into
releasing Assembly info.... hehe



>--Cliff Biffle
>
>Everything's better in a tube.  Take for example: yogurt, spaghetti,
>pierogies, mustard and Cool Whip, chicken.
>
EWWWWWWW>.......



Andrew


>
>
>
>
>

References:

A92: Error 6

From: "Oskar Kaszubski" <okaszubski@memgardens.com>

A92: Assorted '92 stuff

From: Cliff Biffle <cbiffle@safety.net>