Re: A92: Suggestions for the 92+ upgrade.
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: Suggestions for the 92+ upgrade.
>The plain old TI-92 already does tokenization, as do *all* of the TI
>graphing calculators.
My own tests prove that wrong.
I've created three programs. The first one consists of empty lines. The
second one
consists of one empty line and solve(4*x^2+5*x+6=3*y,x). The third one
consist of
two times solve(4*x^2+5*x+6=3*y,x). The sizes of those programs are: 29, 53,
77.
The length of solve(4*x^2+5*x+6=3*y,x) is 24 characters. 53 = 24 + 29. 77 =
29 + 24 + 24.
Each program has the same number of <enter>s in it. It suggests that the 92
stores
the program as plain ASCII, without doing tokenization or compression. Of
course, I
could be wrong.
>II, a sort of "Fargo emulation layer" nested underneath the TI-92 Plus's
>built-in asm.
That would be acceptable. Let's hope it works. It would be a shame to lose
ability
to use all existing Fargo programs.
>Just use the CUSTOM menu.
I'm afraid I don't understand how it works. Let's say I want that whenever I
press
F6 in the text editor, it types é. How could I do that ?
Follow-Ups: