[A89] Re: about a68k

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A89] Re: about a68k
From: "R.A." <funkaster@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:14:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <OE246Su94e5O25rrcvg000073a5@hotmail.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020527105020.009e9a00@pop.gmx.de> <OE246Su94e5O25rrcvg000073a5@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>There _HAS_ to be an assembler out there for mac somewhere. Because the
>older macs ARE 68k! look around at places like download.com or through a
>search engine.

yes! that's what I thought... well, actually CodeWarrior and MPW both 
can create 68k binaries. The problem is the linker, and I'm not sure 
if there's any difference between binaries for 68000 and 680x0, 
although in CW I can explicity choose between 68k code and 68020, I 
assume that 68k is more universal. So, let's assume I can produce the 
68k binary, the problem is the linker... :(

regards,
ra.-

Follow-Ups:

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: Sebastian Reichelt <SebastianR@gmx.de>

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>

References:

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: Sebastian Reichelt <SebastianR@gmx.de>

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>