Re: A89: What's Wrong?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: What's Wrong?
i've heard similar things, but of course at this point they're all
theoretical. i also heard about the slowing down of light in some apparatus
a little while ago, but i could't remember the details. but einstein was
always talking about the fastest possible speed of light.
/brian
The path to enlightenment is /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cullan" <Cullan@calc.org>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
>
> but!
> ( i saw this on TV last week)
>
> if you could creat a gravitation field around a space craft, the field
could
> travel faster than light, while you (in the filed) are traveling slower
>
> quite interesting
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andreas Hjordt" <ahj@trition.dk>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 6:56 AM
> Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
>
>
> >
> > Einstein's general theory of relativity and gravity only states that it
is
> > impossible to travel _AT_ the speed of light (I will not go into deeper
> > explanation ask your teacher). However no one has yet made _anything_
> travel
> > even close to the speed of light.
> > But there was a scientist whom succeed in slowing down the speed of a
> laser
> > (witch travels at light speed).
> >
> > cya,
> > Andreas Hjordt
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian Taylor" <jodokaast@hotmail.com>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 6:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > are you sure? if so, they've managed to completely refute einstein's
> > general
> > > theory of relativity and gravity as we know it will have to be
> completely
> > > reworked... mass as well...
> > >
> > > /brian
> > >
> > > The path to enlightenment is /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Greg" <newstome2001@yahoo.com>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 10:23 PM
> > > Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > actually, in my physics class there is a newspaper clipping that
says
> > > > something about a university somewhere sending a laser beam faster
> than
> > > the
> > > > speed of light... although they haven't found a practical use for it
> > yet!
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Brian Taylor" <jodokaast@hotmail.com>
> > > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 5:49 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > i'm not sure if you can even presume to know what would happen, as
> > it's
> > > > just
> > > > > plain and simple impossible to travel faster than the speed of
> light.
> > > > >
> > > > > /brian
> > > > >
> > > > > The path to enlightenment is /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Jean Canazzi" <jcanazzi@cybercable.fr>
> > > > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 4:33 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Peter David wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If one is travelling faster than light, would he really travel
> > back
> > > in
> > > > > > > time, or just be able to view past events again without being
> able
> > > to
> > > > > > > change them?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The first one
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
References: