Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?

Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• From: Scott Dial <homosapian@geocities.com>
• Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:46:53 -0500
• Organization: ByMe Inc. Technologies \ TCPA
• References: <200003100641.HAA19434@mail.utic.net.ba>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Hmm... 300? Sounds like it would be a large bloated library...

Zeljko Juric wrote:
> to C. By the way, there is a special collection of
> routines (written by me) called tigcclib with more than
> 300 routines for usage with tigcc.

-- 
Scott "_Wrath_" Dial
wrath@calc.org
ICQ#3608935
TimeCity AI Guy II - www.timecity.org
Member of TCPA - tcpa.calc.org

• Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• From: "Niklas Brunlid" <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>

• A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• From: "Zeljko Juric" <zjuric@utic.net.ba>

• Prev: Re: A89: Palet Shifting Routine
• Next: Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread