Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates
From: "Sebastian Reichelt" <SebastianR@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:59:17 -0400
References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0006101151520.17899-100000@conquest.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> <395208BF.F986024D@oregontrail.net> <39516438.10046085@drrobin.yi.org>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


| > What is the eye's persistence of vision, anyway?  Around 50 Hz?  Can't
| > be much higher than that else I would see my 60 Hz lamp blinking...

24 Hz, I think.  However, monitors running at 60 Hz do flicker, I think
mainly because they can't hit a multiple of the eye's frequency exactly.  I
don't know how long a pixel turned on on an LCD stays visible; you just have
to test out what works and what doesn't.

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates

From: "Hatch" <hatch@cyberport.com>

Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates

From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>

References:

Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates

From: Patrick Davidson <pad@ocf.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates

From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>

Re: A89: Re: Frame Rates

From: Robin Kirkman <misty@drrobin.yi.org>