Re: A89: Me distributing roms.


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Me distributing roms.




hey I said I'm sick.. I'm on the edge of delierum.. but okay my bad.

----- Original Message -----
From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.


>
> I think you mean the "extra lil 24 bytes". :-)  But also notice that 1
terabyte
> is almost 1.1 (not 1.0) trillion bytes.. just because those little 24
bytes add
> up after a while.
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 5:29 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> >
> > um. =] That would put me almost exact. I said a 1mbit cable is
> > ~100kilobytes/s download. How do you say my conversion are off when they
are
> > dead accurate. Keeping in mind I said RoUGH cause I am sick and taking
that
> > extra lil 24 bits into account is pointless to say the least.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Daniel Wood <thedew@usit.net>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 11:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > woah dude you're way off on your conversions.
> > > 1 byte(word) = 8 bits
> > > so a 800kilobit internet connection means 100kilobytes/sec RATED*
speed.
> > >
> > > A T1 is 1.45MegaBits(or was it 1.54?) which is equal to ~1485KiloBits
a
> > > second which is ~186KiloBytes/sec a second(more commonly called
K/sec).
> > >
> > > *RATED: My 64k isdn is RATED @ 8K/sec(64/8=8), that doesn't mean I
cant
> > > sustain download @ 11K/sec for hours(I do that all the time). I can
> > achieve
> > > 11K/sec because of compression.
> > >
> > > (BTW: If I have something wrong here please correct me.)
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > > thedew@usit.net
> > > http://www.msneptune.net
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:09 PM
> > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I believe his math is wrong. The OC256 that at&t is laying across
the
> > > > atlantic to connect the 2 continents is a 2 gbit line which would
> > roughly
> > > be
> > > > ~200meg/s
> > > > the quick conversion for (g)(m)(k)bits/s is to just add 2 zero's and
> > > reduce
> > > > to a lower letter if nessessary.
> > > > for example. a 56kbit modem like an x2 is really 5.6 kilobytes max
> > > > downstream
> > > > and a 384k/s downstream dsl would be ~38.4 kilobytes /s
> > > > a 1mbit cable line would be 100kilobytes per second. etc.
> > > > I may not know how to do anything but hello world in asm but
networking
> > I
> > > do
> > > > know =]
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Bryan
Rabeler
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:17 PM
> > > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How did you calculate that?
> > > >
> > > > Bryan
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:46 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Around 8.5gbps if my math is correct.  Equivalent to 192 T3 lines.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:34 PM
> > > > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > How fast is an OC192 again?
> > > > >
> > > > > Bryan
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > > > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:06 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Send me the roms in an email and I'll throw em on a server
that's on
> > > > > an
> > > > > > OC192.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > > > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Olle Hedman [mailto:oh@hem.passagen.se]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:02 PM
> > > > > > To: asm89
> > > > > > Subject: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This week might be the last one I distribute old ti-roms.
> > > > > > Someone has reported me to abuse@liu.se (my university), and to
TI.
> > > > > > Same someone did not contact me.
> > > > > > I recieved the call from "abuse" today. He was very nice and
> > > > > > understanding and I
> > > > > > think he thought it was quite silly, but that he just had to
talk
> > with
> > > > > > me
> > > > > > because of this letter.
> > > > > > I got a week to either remove them, or come up with a valid
reason
> > for
> > > > > > me to
> > > > > > continue having them.
> > > > > > I have yet not gotten any response from TI, but they have
visited my
> > > > > > site.
> > > > > > I'm eagerly awaiting their letter :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > file://Olle
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>



References: