RE: A89: Me distributing roms.


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: A89: Me distributing roms.



Title: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.

On our OC192, we haven't even gotten remotely close to its capacity. 

Mark E. Scott Jr.
mscott@databasecity.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha@sollentuna.net]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:30 AM
To: 'assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org'
Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.


(note - OCn = STS-n when it comes to speed)

OC-1 is 51.84Mbps.

Then just multiply the "OC-number" by that, so:
OC-3 is 155.52Mbps
OC-12 is 622.08Mbps
OC-48 is 2.48832Gbps
OC-192 is 9.95328Gbps

Basically, what STS-n does is it multiplexes n STS-1 frames on a single
connection.


On that subject, show me a server that can put out OC-192 worth of bandwidth
:-) Or for that matter, an internet backbone connection point that can
sustain anything near that.

//Magnus


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> Sent: den 14 januari 2000 03:21
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
>
> Well, how do you know how many mbit/gbit a OCxx is?
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:09 PM
> Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> >
> > I believe his math is wrong. The OC256 that at&t is laying
> across the
> > atlantic to connect the 2 continents is a 2 gbit line which
> would roughly be
> > ~200meg/s
> > the quick conversion for (g)(m)(k)bits/s is to just add 2
> zero's and reduce
> > to a lower letter if nessessary.
> > for example. a 56kbit modem like an x2 is really 5.6 kilobytes max
> > downstream
> > and a 384k/s downstream dsl would be ~38.4 kilobytes /s
> > a 1mbit cable line would be 100kilobytes per second. etc.
> > I may not know how to do anything but hello world in asm
> but networking I do
> > know =]
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of
> Bryan Rabeler
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:17 PM
> > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> >
> > How did you calculate that?
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:46 PM
> > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > > Around 8.5gbps if my math is correct.  Equivalent to 192 T3 lines.
> > >
> > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:34 PM
> > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > > How fast is an OC192 again?
> > >
> > > Bryan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:06 PM
> > > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Send me the roms in an email and I'll throw em on a
> server that's on
> > > an
> > > > OC192.
> > > >
> > > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Olle Hedman [mailto:oh@hem.passagen.se]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:02 PM
> > > > To: asm89
> > > > Subject: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This week might be the last one I distribute old ti-roms.
> > > > Someone has reported me to abuse@liu.se (my
> university), and to TI.
> > > > Same someone did not contact me.
> > > > I recieved the call from "abuse" today. He was very nice and
> > > > understanding and I
> > > > think he thought it was quite silly, but that he just
> had to talk with
> > > > me
> > > > because of this letter.
> > > > I got a week to either remove them, or come up with a
> valid reason for
> > > > me to
> > > > continue having them.
> > > > I have yet not gotten any response from TI, but they
> have visited my
> > > > site.
> > > > I'm eagerly awaiting their letter :)
> > > >
> > > > //Olle
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>