Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 14:48:53 +0200
References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0008181326320.22978-100000@apocalypse.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> <399DE6F5.43651D8E@hem.passagen.se> <399E784C.B44D0360@cybercable.fr>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Jean Canazzi wrote:
> Well, 256k is only 18 bits, so what does it have to do with the 24 bits
> address bus of the 68000 ? For me, the fact that the 68000 only have a
> 24 bits address bus just means that the higher byte will always be
> ignored (btw, isn't this property used somewhere in TIGccLib ?).

heh. another proof that you shouldn't try to write stuff, trying too look like
you know something at 3:45 in the morning. :)
I messed up. I calculated my "power of 2" wrong. (I really should have noticed)
Sorry for that.

//Olle

References:

Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON

From: Patrick Davidson <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON

From: Jean Canazzi <jcanazzi@cybercable.fr>

Prev: Re: A89: HELP!
Next: A89: Re: HELP!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread