A89: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A89: Re: Re: Re: CORRECTION: Shift+ON




Hi!

> You were correct on many of them, and a few of them were
> only a little off. 

In fact, some names are picked from Gareth James's info files.

> Because of the NDA, I don't think TI would like us telling
> you what the real names are, but, believe me, we are trying
> our hardest to get you included in the beta (maybe even late
> alpha) testing.

Thanks: I just received a call from TI. But I am afraid about
one thing: their SDK will obviously be a supplement to TIGCC,
not a replacement for it. The contract which I must sign to
become a tester will probably force me to stop developing
TIGCCLIB, because TIGCC is a concurence to their SDK. This is
not good. At the moment, TIGCCLIB 2.1 is a bit buggy, so I
need to prepare TIGCCLIB 2.2 with some bugfixes. But I am 
afraid that it will be illegal.

Cheers,

Zeljko Juric