Re: A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)
Does this mean that, some day, there will actually -be- an SDK?
And am I allowed to ask if the SDK is quite as evil as TI's record would
suggest?
--robin
Mike Grass wrote:
>
> Alpha testing. Sorry, NDA is in order.
>
> --Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonas Lööf" <f96jolo@dd.chalmers.se>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2000 10:35 AM
> Subject: Re: A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)
>
> >
> > So your beta testing the SDK, Scott? Can you give any gossip, or have
> > you signed a NDA?
> >
> > //Jonas
> >
> > -------------------
> > > That email was supposed to go to a different list. . .
> > > ...< snip >...
> > > -Scott
> >
> >
> >
References: