Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00




I don't know but, I've heard that you can do that with the Enhanced Kernel.
I've only heard about it though.  I've never bothered with archiving
libraries and ect.  And I believe you can with LexOs too (I'm assuming since
they were made by the same person).
-----Original Message-----
From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00


>
>For some reason, I have no problem running programs with the libraries not
>only archived, but in a LIB folder...
>
>-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
>ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
>http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Patrick Sweeney <psweeney@geocities.com>
>To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 11:54 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
>
>> You can archive libraries, you just can't use them archived.
>>
>> keymo wrote:
>>
>> > well while on their webpage i saw the archive utility they had.  i
>remember
>> > it coming out way back when but i didn't try it until now.  it works
>really
>> > well, but unless i'm doing something wrong, i think it's still kinda
>> > useless.  (for gaming ppl)
>> >
>> > my reasoning. . . it only saves the archived things and you can't
>archive
>> > the libraries.  so once the calc crashes, you lose the libraries.  now
>> > games which require libraries are useless in class. =*(
>> >
>> > or maybe there's a way around it. . .
>> >
>> > keymo
>> >
>> > At 10:22 PM 10/26/1999, you wrote:
>> >
>> > >In a message dated 10/26/99 6:10:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>AndrewM@ev1.net
>> > >writes:
>> > >
>> > ><<
>> > >  a few things are diff... but it has the option to comile to a string
>or a
>> > >  asm file! read the doc! >>
>> > >
>> > >i dont feel like downloading it if it is something i dont want.  =)
im
>an
>> > >idiot,  im on cable, and i still wont take the 3 seconds.  =/    well
>anyway,
>> > >i think it said that you can't use libraries?  is that true?  and if
>so,
>> > >isn't that gonna mean for some huuuuge files?  and im too stupid to do
>shit
>> > >without libraries.  so that's a problem.
>> > >             _reddog_
>
>
>



Follow-Ups: