RE: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
From: "Indifference" <agrawal1327@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:18:51 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4.2.1.19991026232457.00a26360@pop3.umr.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Libraries are usually pretty small, I keep an archived copy in another
folder which i can copy over in case of a crash.

Indifference

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of keymo
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 12:27 AM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00

well while on their webpage i saw the archive utility they had.  i remember
it coming out way back when but i didn't try it until now.  it works really
well, but unless i'm doing something wrong, i think it's still kinda
useless.  (for gaming ppl)

my reasoning. . . it only saves the archived things and you can't archive
the libraries.  so once the calc crashes, you lose the libraries.  now
games which require libraries are useless in class. =*(

or maybe there's a way around it. . .

keymo

At 10:22 PM 10/26/1999, you wrote:

>In a message dated 10/26/99 6:10:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
AndrewM@ev1.net
>writes:
>
><<
>  a few things are diff... but it has the option to comile to a string or a
>  asm file! read the doc! >>
>
>i dont feel like downloading it if it is something i dont want.  =)  im an
>idiot,  im on cable, and i still wont take the 3 seconds.  =/    well
anyway,
>i think it said that you can't use libraries?  is that true?  and if so,
>isn't that gonna mean for some huuuuge files?  and im too stupid to do shit
>without libraries.  so that's a problem.
>             _reddog_
>

References:

Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00

From: keymo <keymo@stones.com>