Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775


=)

-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/

----- Original Message -----
From: Jarrod Seth <xero@sover.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775


> I just got my ti-89 a week or less ago, after i gave my ti-86 to my
> girlfriend. It is hardware version 2.00, with the 1.05 software or
whatever.
> I don't have it in front of me, it is in my car, but i specifically
remember
> the hardware version being 2.00. Seeing as how i am incredibly ignorant
> about 89's, and 68k assembly so far, i can't elaborate much as to what
> version 2.00 offers, but hey, i thought i'd let miles raymond know the
> "fabled" version 2.00 exists.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 11:03 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775
>
> >Actually, no... I have not. =(
> >
> >I have looked in many stores for the fabled 'Hardware Version 2.00'
TI-89s,
> >but to no avail... =(
> >
> >I might just have to buy another TI-89 to actually see this spark new
> gossip
> >topic. =P
> >
> >-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> >ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> >http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Scott Noveck <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
> >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 7:50 PM
> >Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775
> >
> >> >Here, here!  Finally a guy with sense! =)
> >> >
> >> >- -Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> >> >ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> >> >http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
> >>
> >> No, Miles, he's WRONG in this instance -- sure, the programs can be
> >patched,
> >> but the NEW 89s with the Hardware version dispayed ARE DIFFERENT - have
> >you
> >> actually seen one of these?
> >>
> >>             -Scott Noveck
> >>              ACZ Member
> >>              http://scott.acz.org <-- coming soon =)
References: