Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries




Well I could make it worse by flooding the mailing lists :P j/k
----- Original Message -----
From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


>
> Who is Brian?
>
> Who's been sending you 75 e-mails per hour?  That's quite a lot.  I don't
> even think I sent that many out in a day.
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 1:00 AM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
>
>
> >
> > Look brian man. I love geting 75 email's per hour as much as the next
guy
> > but can you maybe say more per e-mail or something please. Thanks.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 9:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
> >
> >
> > >
> > > But would assembly programs written only for HW2 be better, more
> enhanced,
> > > etc?  Or is there no real advantage for doing that?
> > >
> > > Bryan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html


References: