A89: Re: Re: Re: POTM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A89: Re: Re: Re: POTM
But the reality is that programs are NOT ported between those two
calculators.
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: Zeromus Mog <zeromusmog@home.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 11:01 PM
Subject: A89: Re: Re: POTM
>
> The TI-89 and the TI-92+ are, thanks to the way their OS is coded, almost
> completely identical to one another. Just about any 89 game can be ported
to
> the 92+, and vice versa. That is why the category is the same- the best
> program would likely be ported to both calcs, and therefore win two
awards.
> And that just ain't fair.
>
> And you say ticalc.org has no logic.
>
> -Zero
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 6:52 PM
> Subject: A89: Re: POTM
>
>
> >
> > As it is a mystery to you, it is a mystery to logic. The prisoners at
> > ticalc.org often take it into their power to defy logic.
> >
> > -Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> > ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> > http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Patrick Davidson <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>; <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 5:17 PM
> > Subject: A89: POTM
> >
> > > I recently noticed that the current POTM voting page has the TI-92+
> > > and TI-89 grouped together. Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't
> > > really understand why this should be, as the 89 and 92+ seem not to
> > > be identical to me. If anyone can explain this, please enlighten me.
> >
> >
>
>
>
References: