Re: A89: Re: Hello everyone.
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Hello everyone.
just put the subroutine in a file, say decomp.inc and write "include
decomp.inc" at the end of your code (before the data). the same way
you write "include tios.h" at the top. and if the file is binary use
incbin (which would be nice for a big routine so that compile time is
saved).
>
> hmm.. then you either need to write a new assembler, or find one
that can call
> an external program for preprocessing of code (I havn't seen any,
for any asm)
> or put it in a bat, that calls your external program for
preprocessing.. hmm 2
> and 3 is about the same.. write a preprocessor.. I don't really see
any
> advantages.. why not just use the tools there is for encode, put it
in your
> code, include the routines needed and use them?
> I think it is a lot work for so little gain..
> and the simpler you make it for new programmers, the longer time it
will take
> before they relly understand what asm is, and what they are doing..
IMHO...
>
> file://Olle
>
> SirKnight wrote:
> >
> > >very bad if you use it more then one time. or a lot waste of
space at
> > least.
> > >a macro is copied into your code everytime you use it.
> > >what is wrong with a decompress subroutine? I don't see that you
win very
> > much
> > >by your method.
> >
> > Subroutine is the correct word. But the idea is that in your code
you put
> > the uncompressed images, and the assembler (compiles?) the code
and
> > compresses the images then includes the _subroutine_ :) and
automatically
> > calls it when needed.
>
>
References: