Re: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #727
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #727
Mark Scott wrote:
>
> I would be happy if they would just fix some of the bugs I've found.
> Without any ASM on my calculator I have crashed it several times. Very
> very annoying.
>
> Mark E. Scott Jr.
> mscott@dbcity.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Noveck [mailto:noveck@pluto.njcc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:10 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #727
>
> >Don't feel cheated! TI has one major thing that they did that can
> excuse a
> >fairly bloated program: flashROM. Had we had to wait for them to
> optomize
> the
> >code, we would have had to wait until we graduated from High School
> before
> >they released the TI89. By having a FlashROM and leaving more room for
> >upgradability, and waiting for later to optomize (or perhaps even a
> rewrite
> >in Assembly), we can get the calculator earlier. I don't feel cheated.
>
> . . . or they could have conned us into buying new calcs early and never
> meet the promise of upgrades =)
How can you crash it without asm?
C2b3
References: