Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: Cyong0@aol.com
• Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:01:22 EST
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Dang, Bryan really is the pessimistic "I'm Right, You're Wrong" kinda guy:P  
If you worked at TI, you'd be the one who said, "HAHAHAHA!!!  stupid loser 
programmers, destroy their games, make mac-like TI's!!!"  I'll bet you use a 
Mac and eat spam too eh.  What next, saying you're anti-everything?

*sighs in relief* Ahh, my anger has been threaded upon the pathetic web of 
your soul.

-Trailblazer

• Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

• Prev: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
• Next: A89: Re: WARNING TO USERS OF AMS 2.03
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread