Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 21:42:26 -0800
References: <0.c9376e46.2583278a@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Lets just say that in 100 billion years. Every year 100 particles of dust
find eachother and decide to stick together. In 100 billion years that dust
ball would be at least 300 thousand miles wide =] And scientists say that
the earth is getting bigger as space dust finds our gravity and becomes part
of the earth .. it's just on a larger scale than I can concept.

----- Original Message -----
From: <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin


>
> In a message dated 12/10/99 10:56:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> AzNgUy66@aol.com writes:
>
> > and i was just wondering.....
> >
> >  when has evolution been disproven?
>
> what l mean is how the parts of "evidence" "supporting" evolution has been
> disproven.  Neither creation or evolution fit into the scientific method,
> anyway.  But even still, you must look at evidence supporting either one.
> Neanderthal man, Giraffes stretching their necks, etc. are still taught as
> fact in some textbooks, and even a few random museums probably.  As many
> things, such as ape-man skulls and stuff are disproven (ususally turn out
to
> be an ape jaw attached to a human skull or whatever), there is an
increasing
> amount of evidence for creation coming out in more recent years.
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs
created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
>
>

References:

Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

From: TurboSoft@aol.com