Re: A89: U.S. Encryption Laws


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: U.S. Encryption Laws




So you have a strong voice for freeware?  I can't make out exactly what you
support.

-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zoltan Kocsi" <zoltan@bendor.com.au>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: A89: U.S. Encryption Laws

>  > That's what I thought, too.  That would explain why TI wants to sign
all
>  > software:  nothing stops you from copying software but software checks
>  > your serial number and self-destructs if it isn't right.  And you can't
>  > modify software to accept your serial because its signed because calc
>  > checks signature. And TI wants to moderate signed programs so you can't
>  > sign your modified software.
>
> Depending on their customer profile, they can either succeed or loose
> completely. Younger members of the society tend to be low on monetary
> resources but would take high risk to attaing gain, fame or just the
> thrill of it. If TI's main line of customers is mostly teenagers then a
> possible scenario is that someone (for a few bucks, probably) with
> suitable equipment (a reasonable soldering iron :-) would disable the
> HW protection (permanently or temporarily) and overwrite the signature
> and checksum parts of the FLASH to anyone in the neighbourhood.
>
> This would obviously void the warranty, however, if the cost of the
> software is high enough, then that won't be a deterrent. As a secondary
> effect, the unprotected calculators would merrily run all sorts of other
> applications such as games and alike - this might make people do the
> desexing of their calculator even if they would not otherwise pirate
> software sold by TI. (Now, however, that their calc can easily install
> anything, they will get that cool package from their friends...)
>
> I do not know a single software protection scheme which was
> successful. The more they protect it, the quicker the warez puppies
> break the lock: dongles, key-disks, serial numbers, license managers,
> you name it. It is only a question of whether customers want to get
> the SW for free or willing to pay even if it's an arm and a leg.
>
> Zoltan



Follow-Ups: References: