Re:A89: U.S. Encryption Laws

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re:A89: U.S. Encryption Laws
From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:52:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: <00f701bf3d1f$66cc2a80$0100a8c0@dew>
Mime: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148)
References: <3846F662.FBFFFBBC@drrobin.yi.org> <19991202234602.A4465@m101.ryd.student.liu.se> <3846F765.2D944EB8@drrobin.yi.org> <19991203003031.B4465@m101.ryd.student.liu.se> <00f701bf3d1f$66cc2a80$0100a8c0@dew>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


It is. I think 128-kbit is the strongest allowed. But it cannot be 
exported to other countries, especially france. Look at netscapes 
secure 128-bit version.

At approximately 5:46 PM -0600GMT on the day Earth People call 
12/2/99, Daniel Wood declared:

>Whats are the laws concerning encryption and how good it can be.
>
>Also can someone explain to me the XXXBit(256, 512, 56, etc) encyptions.
>
>I thought I heard someone earlier say that 512Bit encryption in the US was
>illegal because the Gov. can' crack it.

---
I pledge allegiance to the Mac of Apple Computer Incorporated, and to 
the developers for which it stands, one platform, under Jobs, 
indestructible, with creativity and multimedia for all.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Re:A89: U.S. Encryption Laws

From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>

Re: A89: U.S. Encryption Laws

From: Robin Kirkman <misty@drrobin.yi.org>

References:

A89: rom call return values

From: Robin Kirkman <misty@drrobin.yi.org>

Re: A89: rom call return values

From: Johan <johei804@student.liu.se>

Re: A89: rom call return values

From: Robin Kirkman <misty@drrobin.yi.org>

Re: A89: rom call return values

From: Johan <johei804@student.liu.se>

A89: U.S. Encryption Laws

From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>

Prev: A89: U.S. Encryption Laws
Next: RE: A89: This is all Ti will tell me. Like they didn't make it. B .S.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread