Re: A89: rom call return values

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: rom call return values
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:28:54 -0600
Organization: Expert Internet Services
References: <3846F662.FBFFFBBC@drrobin.yi.org> <19991202234602.A4465@m101.ryd.student.liu.se>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Knowledge is thine strength!  Help yourself to a brand mug 'o ale and tell
all my friend!

-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan" <johei804@student.liu.se>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: A89: rom call return values

> On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 17:44:50 -0500, Robin Kirkman wrote:
> >
> > what register do the tios rom calls place their return value in?
> > --robin
> >
>
> a0 if pointer, otherwise d0.w or d0.l depending on (integer) size.
>
> structs are returned in a bizarre way that you don't want to deal with.
> (I can explain if anyone cares to know...)
>
> file://Johan

References:

A89: rom call return values

From: Robin Kirkman <misty@drrobin.yi.org>

Re: A89: rom call return values

From: Johan <johei804@student.liu.se>

Prev: Re: A89: AMS 2.00 Released & DoorsOS Beta 2
Next: Re: A89: This is all Ti will tell me. Like they didn't make it. B.S.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread