Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: ASM without libraries
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: ASM without libraries
do you really mean without just libraries (that is no problem, just dont use
them)
or do you mean without a shell? thats more tricky, I don't think there is any
publically available linkers for that out now. (I have one, but I didn't make
it, and I think I agreed not to spread it. because I already have one, I dont
care to make one myself.. If I did, I would release it)
//Olle
Lynn McCartney wrote:
>
> Do you know the name of the program or the author?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wesley Moore <moore.w@hotkey.net.au>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Saturday, August 28, 1999 6:17 AM
> Subject: A89: Re: Re: ASM without libraries
>
> >
> >There was a program, which the author believed was the first TI-89 assembly
> >program and didn't use libs. I can't find it though.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Lynn McCartney <littlbit@txcyber.com>
> >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Sent: Sunday, 29 August 1999 1:12
> >Subject: A89: Re: ASM without libraries
> >
> >
> >>
> >> It would be very hard to find any that would need libraries and doesn't
> >use
> >> them. I personally use them, mainly because I'm lasy.
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Wesley Moore <moore.w@hotkey.net.au>
> >> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >> Date: Saturday, August 28, 1999 5:55 AM
> >> Subject: A89: ASM without libraries
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Could someone point me towards some TI-89 assembly programs, with source
> >> >which don't require any libraries.
> >> >
> >> >Wesley
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
Follow-Ups:
References: