Re: A89: Uh-Oh. . .

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Uh-Oh. . .
From: Jared173@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 20:15:50 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 4/12/99 5:30:38 PM Central Daylight Time, 
noveck@pluto.njcc.com writes:

> right now, I'm using "Shell (Filename)" to compile it, is there
>  a better way to do this in Visual Basic?

Using the Shell ( ) command is the only easy way to do it.  It should be 
working though..make sure you're using the correct parameters when executing 
the DOS compiler.  Are you getting an error when compiling, or is it just not 
working on the calc?

-Jared C.
http://come.to/tivault

Prev: Re: A89: get a number
Next: Re: A89: Assembly Studio 89/92+ RELEASED
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread