Re: A89: asm89 compiling errors
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: asm89 compiling errors
1. It runs without a shell but needs some librairies exactly the same as for
the 92+ but recompiled for the 89, you can find them with the beta of
Plusshell for 89.
2. You're perfectly right, you lost 28 pixels at the bottom and 80 pixels on
the right.
3. Yep to modify the prog just add : xdef _ti89 at the top of the source
code and compile it using asm89 or a similar batch file that u can get with
Plusshell for the 89.
4. I think that all Calculator prog should be released with the source code
and be freeware, I think that modify a prog to make it works on any calc
compatible is a great satisfaction for the man that made the code.
No problem =).
opus1@wanadoo.fr
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Mike Newman <miken@dodgenet.com>
À : assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date : mercredi 7 octobre 1998 01:57
Objet : Re: A89: asm89 compiling errors
>
>At 07:57 PM 10/6/98 +0200, you wrote:
>...
>>I attached Phoenix compiled for the 89 note that the screen size of the 89
>>is smaller than the 92+ so you can t all of the screen play.
>...
>
>Several questions:
>
>1. Will this run without any shells or libraries?
>2. Since there is a screen size difference, does this copy work exactly
>the same at the 92 version but with the last 80 pixels left off the right
>and the last 28 pixels left off the bottom? (TI89 screen = 100 x 160 and
>TI92 screen = 128 x 240)
>3. Is it there a simple procedure for modifying TI-92+ ASM Fargo progs to
>run on the 89?
>4. Someone said something about it being illegal (maybe that's not the
>right word) to port 92 programs like that. Is that true?
>
>Thanx in advance for any help!!
>
>======================================
> Mike Newman
> miken@dodgenet.com
> ICQ: 2114458
>
> TI PAGE
>http://www.dodgenet.com/~miken/ti.html
>======================================
>