Re: A86: Re: (no subject)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: (no subject)
Heh, somehow I knew you would respond to my e-mail. :) There are different ways
of "forcing someone to retire".... anyway, even if they didn't force you to
retire, they certainly didn't go all out to make you stay...
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Meyer" <kirkmeyer@bigfoot.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: (no subject)
>
> GAH!!! ticalc.org did not forced me to retire. No one forced me to retire,
> however I felt that I somewhat had promised to _YOU_ that I was going to
> retire, and felt that I should.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: A86: Re: (no subject)
>
>
> > The Cuba issue? Ok sure, Magnus or Chris aren't going to physically
> murder a
> > staff member for speaking out. But its the same general idea. The
> coordinators
> > adamantly believe the current system of coordinators is the best system
> and is
> > working perfectly. Near the end of Kirk's term at ticalc.org, he spoke
> out
> > against the idea of coordinators and look what happened to him, he
> basically was
> > forced to retire. The coordinators would NOT look kindly on a staff
> member that
> > spoke out against the system.
> >
> > Bryan
>
>
>
>
References: