A86: Re: Account Abuse


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A86: Re: Account Abuse




I formally request that the real, exact reason why this action was taken.    I
did nothing to warrant such an extreme course of action.  Also, I am under the
impression that Nathan is the "head" of the News section and is also the person
in charge of deleting comments.  After talking to him a few days ago, I
discovered that he was on vacation while this whole drama took place on your
staff mailing list, and he had no real input into the decision.  He doesn't even
understand fully why this action was taken.  This completely baffles me why
Nathan of all people wouldn't know this.  Why don't you explain yourselves?

Bryan

"Let me remind people that we're not in the business of censorship" - Chris
Dornfeld, 4 November 1998

----- Original Message -----
From: <accounts@ticalc.org>
To: <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 9:46 PM
Subject: Account Abuse


> Bryan,
>
> We sent you an initial warning regarding your
> abusive usage of your ticalc.org account.
>
> We sent you a second warning after continued
> abuse of your account and disabled your account's posting privileges
> for one week.  You were warned that further abuse would result in
> total loss of account or posting privileges.
>
> It is our judgment that you have once again continued to abuse your
> ticalc.org account, and this is a notification that we have revoked
> your posting privileges permanently.
>
> Please do not appeal this action; ticalc.org accounts are a privilege
> offered by ticalc.org and subject to the sole discretion of ticalc.org
> staff.
>
> Additionally, you are reminded of our policy of allowing only one
> account per user.  You may not create another account to use for
> posting. Any user holding multiple accounts will have all accounts
> removed and may lose all access to the site.
>
> - the ticalc.org Staff
>
>
>



Follow-Ups: References: