Re: A86: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:13:27 PDT

Re: A86: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:13:27 PDT

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:13:27 PDT
• From: McBorder@aol.com
• Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 19:56:46 EDT
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 6/17/99 11:54:31 PM !!!First Boot!!!, david@acz.org writes:

> 
>  Ah, drawing every interrupt, that is probably what was screwing it up.  I
>  think ideally it should only redraw if you are setting at a _getkey prompt.
>  That would ensure it didn't overwrite anything going on (don't see why it
>  would affect anything, but evidently it does somehow).
>  
ok since the interrupts are called 200 times per second
each one can only take 1/200 of a second
what happens if it takes longer?? does it just slow down the calc or possibly 
mess it up

• Re: A86: Interrupts
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>

• Prev: Re: A86: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:13:27 PDT
• Next: Re: A86: Interrupts
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread