Re: A86: asm clock?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: asm clock?




Of course it can (that is, if the battery power can really be input).  But
it's a very difficult problem.


-----Original Message-----
From: JBrett <tbarwick@esn.net>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, September 12, 1998 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: A86: asm clock?


>
>So what do you think, Dux, can it be done and keep accurate time??
>--------------
>Jbrett
>tbarwick@esn.net
>http://ww2.esn.net/~tbarwick
>I just added a TI-86 page, Check it out!!!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
>To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Saturday, September 12, 1998 10:59 PM
>Subject: Re: A86: asm clock?
>
>
>>
>>
>>The clock would run even when the calc is off.  Only the program that
reads
>>the time would run while the calc is on.  The interrupts are running while
>>the calc is off.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: DavidY4723@aol.com
>>>>Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 21:10:54 EDT
>>>>To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
>>>>Subject: Re: A86: asm clock?
>>>>Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In a message dated 98-09-12 19:54:35 EDT, TGaArdvark writes:
>>>>
>>>>> > Is it possible to write a clock program for an 86?
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but it's pretty much useless since your calculator's
>>>>> processing speed varies by 20% based on battery life.
>>>>
>>>>I remember Kirk posting a program on here a while back that gave some
>>>kind of
>>>>number relating to the battery power.  Might it be possible to
>>>determine how
>>>>much battery draining affects the processing speed and use the "battery
>>>index"
>>>>to correct for the slowdown?
>>>>
>>>>--David
>>>>
>>>
>>>Probably yes but when I asked if I could maybe use his code from that
>>>for something he wasn't very willing to share (sounds like someone
>>>didn't pay attention in kindergarten!! j/k) but you could still ask.
>>>And why would you want a clock?  You'd have to leave the calc on all the
>>>time which would drain the batteries and if you did turn it off the time
>>>wouldn't be right unless you somehow made it run without power which as
>>>far as I know isn't possible.  Of course you could output a low power
>>>setting to port 2(isn't that right?) and have it run then but that too
>>>would eventually would drain the batteries.
>>>
>>>______________________________________________________
>>>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>