Re: A86: Re: rom calls

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: rom calls
From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 19:56:32 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <006701bd7b24$d4563320$014103cf@joemama.minot> <3.0.5.16.19980511072658.2c177ada@mailserver.netcarrier.com> <35575557.DDC85BEE@eden.rutgers.edu> <35578758.91CC4F0B@mindspring.com> <35578B85.7AEC9578@eden.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


That all depends on your intentions.  If you intend to evaluate the whole thing
yourself, then be my guest - evaluate it and the return it, but if you want to just
intercept it, then it would be much easier just to let the calculator finish parsing.
(read my other mail :-)

Dux Gregis wrote:

> Stephen Hicks wrote:
>
> > Am I correct in thinking that this OP stack is basically like a second stack?
> > That you can push and pop words to and from?  That out of the way, is there any
> > way that sqrtPARSE could return to the parser where it left off rather than going
> > where it does normally (i.e. alternate return or something).  I've tried jumping
> > to several places from sqrtPARSE (page 3, $5851 for one) and it never works
> > correctly - how do you specify an alternate return address?
>
> There's nothing wrong with where it returns to; it's a matter of reading the value
> form the right place and putting it into op1 with that flag set.



--
Stephen Hicks
mailto:shicks@mindspring.com
ICQ:5453914
IRC/AIM:Kupopo
Hopemage:http://www.mindspring.com/~shicks/

References:

A86: Re: rom calls

From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Grams Family <grams@netcarrier.com>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Stephen Hicks <shicks@mindspring.com>

Re: A86: Re: rom calls

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Prev: Re: A86: Charmap
Next: Re: A86: Dec to Hex
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread