Re: A86: Re: Greater Than/Less Than

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Re: Greater Than/Less Than
From: ComAsYuAre@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:12:27 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 12/5/98 22:21:57 Eastern Standard Time, tbarwick@esn.net
writes:

>   ld a,b
>    cp c         ;compare b and c
>    jp z,same
>    jp p,postive (I think, even though that means parity)
>    jp n,negative  (???)
>  I know that jp z does equal

is there any point at all to p and m (not n, m for minus)  ????
c is set when it's negative, z is set when it's equal, and nc for when it's
positive. is there any advantage to using p and m?

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: Re: Greater Than/Less Than

From: Josh Grams <j3grams@earthling.net>

Prev: Re: A86: Re: Re: Greater Than/Less Than
Next: Re: A86: Re: Re: Greater Than/Less Than
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread