Re: A86: batt checker

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: batt checker
From: rabidcow@juno.com (Joshua J Seagoe)
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 16:28:45 -0800
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

On Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:38:41 -0500 "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
writes:
>
>
>
>I'm not sure why the numbers he got were so off, but I doubt it was 
>because
>r overlapped itself.
yeah, 256+85=341 which is still pretty far from 213.  now 128+85=213. 
also 128+94=222.  this seems to be a connection of some kind!

ok, right now it's giving me 33 and 161.  33+128=161.  why would it
sometimes set the high bit and sometimes not?

>>
>>shouldn't be too hard to just make one of the other registers a 
>counter and
>>apply the same algorithm, though.
>
>loss of accuracy

i tried that, too.  it still gave at least two sets of numbers. 
actually, with the one i did like that it seemed to have one number if
the cursor was on when your ran it and one when it was off.

-josh

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]