Re: A86: Please read this!!! New shell!!! I need help!

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: Please read this!!! New shell!!! I need help!
From: KewlAid <almond@home.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 15:04:05 -0700
Organization: @Home Network
References: <340DD231.5EDF83DF@home.com> <3.0.1.32.19970903211137.007e1e60@www.thethinker.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Joseph Gaffney wrote:

> At 07:39 PM 9/3/97 -0400, Dan Eble wrote:
> >You have probably NOT noticed the lack of extensive programming
> >information on the 86.  Hasty action would be wasteful.
>
> Actually Dan (I almost called you Bill =P), "hasty" action would be
> quite
> benificial.  Isn't it easier to make some modifications to some
> addresses,
> etc, rather than rewrite the program in almost the same code, except
> for a
> few minor changes?  Now, I'd have to call that wasteful.  (Besides,
> then
> the GUI would be out quicker =P)
>
> |------------------------------------------------------------|
> |         Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com         |
> |------------------------------------------------------------|
> |           "Tiocfaidh Ár Lá" / "Our Day Will Come"          |
> |  "If Ignorance Is Bliss Then Knock The Smile Off My Face"  |
> |------------------------------------------------------------|
> |                   The Creative Outlet                      |
> |       http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/           |
> |------------------------------------------------------------|

   I agree with this guy. Even if we should take another 6 months to
develop the A86 standard, we should atleast make a shell ASAP to test
the A86. Its already been a couple months since the 86 came out.

References:

A86: Please read this!!! New shell!!! I need help!

From: KewlAid <almond@home.com>

Re: A86: Please read this!!! New shell!!! I need help!

From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@thethinker.com>