Re: LZ: NASR question
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: NASR question
this nasr *problem* I don't belive is actually a problem! What?! you say?
Well, yes, I've never gotten it to compile withouth fixing that as well
from jr to jp but I hear some version of tasm on certain machines (maybe
it was just compiling stuff on macs with whatever their inferior software
compiler was). but I have hear of many cases where it will compile without
editing. dunno :)
Biya,
Will Stokes
8^)
_____________________________________________________
/ /|
/____________________________________________________/ |
| | |
| Will Stokes | |
| wstokes@geocities.com | |
| wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu | |
| | |
| My Personal Homepage | |
| http://www.uic.edu/~hhstokes/will.htm | |
| | |
| The TI-85 Calculator Center | |
| (the website I maintain and update very often) | |
| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/7360/ | |
| | /
|____________________________________________________|/
On Sun, 25 May 1997, Jim Reardon wrote:
> There is one small bugger in the NASR.TXT on TiCalc, you need to change
> one of the jr's to JUMP_() statements. I've always had to do this. I do
> not suggest splitting the routines though, just leave them all together.
>
> Jim Reardon
> jim.reardon@juno.com
> Viva La Mexico
> http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
> We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered in
> blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have
> to end there.
>
>
> On Sun, 25 May 1997 15:34:20 -0500 James <james@superb.net> writes:
> >I have a question about including NASR WARP in my assembly programs.
> >Can
> >the routines be split into 3 or 4 seperate pieces? I'm asking this
> >because
> >no matter where I put it in my code, I always get a "range of relative
> >branch exceeded" from somewhere in the program. If I can't split the
> >code,
> >where should I put it? Thanks for any help you can give me.
> >
> >James
> >
>
Follow-Ups:
References: