Re: LZ: my test results
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: my test results
I take a different approach. I first do as much optimization as I
know how to do, and then I tell everybody that this isn't all that
well optimized. Why? Cause no matter how good I get, there's
always somebody that can show me how to do something better. Then
it's not so embarassing to learn.
Barry
On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, Rob Taylor wrote:
>
> > you can even check these results yourself. by the way if an assembler
> > program is optimized fully(which mine is) the file size will MOST LIKELY
> > be smaller but i can not say for sure. Also note that the file size for
> > the TI-BASIC version is the size of the file AFTER tokenzation(is that
> > spelled correctly).
>
> it's not optimized full at all.. for a start you use JUMP insted of
> jr , and you coudl probably write a more efficient lookup table
> routine, where you get teh key code,sub 1, and 3 (restricts it to
> arrow keys) shift left 3 times, and add to a pointer that points to
>
> dc.b "DOWN",0,0,0,0
> dc.b "LEFT",0,0,0,0
> dc.b "RIGHT",0,0,0,0
> dc.b "UP",0,0,0,0,0,0
>
> and tehn print that address.. I'll think you find teh code would be
> much smaller and faster.
> Just a little lesson in optimisation.....
>
> Rob Taylor MAIL - mailto:rtaylor@ticalc.org
> WEB - http://www.u-net.com/~rtaylor/
>
References: