[A83] Re: Raycasting

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: Raycasting
From: "Frank Schoep" <dsfs98@concepts.nl>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:34:47 +0200
References: <F255ZmcK8r6beUzmRf600001ab3@hotmail.com> <000601c1513d$a6a6f8e0$0201a8c0@brinstar>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


Defiance is definitely the way to go from my (obvisouly irrelevant) point of
view. I thought it had nice features, including support for large textures,
non-arbitrary (tp?) angles and you could see real far. Too bad noone ever
looked at Defiance again.

Frank Schoep

:: http://foreverfornow.cjb.net . dsfs98@concepts.nl ::

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:42 AM
Subject: [A83] Re: Raycasting


>
> I don't think it ever got anywhere.  From what I remember, it looked cool,
> but it was too slow.  You can't write something like that and expect to
> speed it up at the end.  It's a process.
>
> > Is Defiance 82 the one that runs through CrAsH? I have heard of it but
> > neverseen it. I have also seen the raycasting demo for the 83, but i was
> > unimpressed. It is a good achievemant, but not good enough for a game. I
> > suppose their is no harm in trying.
>
>
>
>

References:

[A83] Re: Raycasting

From: "Patrick Prendergast" <d_mf@hotmail.com>

[A83] Re: Raycasting

From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>