[A83] Re: R: Re: Why are there so few ASM math programs for 83(+)?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A83] Re: R: Re: Why are there so few ASM math programs for 83(+)?
Point taken.
And yet, some useful math routines would benefit a lot from ASM power, and
would not be that hard to make. Most of them could probably be incorporated
into the Maths Pack by James Vernon.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas Gilles" <kingofhackers2K@hotmail.com>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:28 AM
Subject: [A83] R: Re: Why are there so few ASM math programs for 83(+)?
>
> Often? I'd say more than that !!
>
> I mean for example you need to take in var X and do something to it...
>
> Input "Num:", X
> (2*X*3)*( X - 1)
>
> In basic you just write it out...
> In ASM well, pure asm it's much harder to do. you have to decompose all
the
> steps of the operation... and the input is already very tideous to do
> (although that should be solved in the near future) ....
> or you could from your ASM create a basic file that does that... but there
> is the possibility of a ERR:Break
> or you could put it into a temp functions var and parse it...
> there are many ways.. but TI-BASIC is the simplest :)
>
> -----Messaggio Originale-----
> Da: "Peter-Martijn Kuipers" <hyper@hysoft-automation.com>
> A: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
> Data invio: venerd́ 13 luglio 2001 8.10
> Oggetto: [A83] Re: Why are there so few ASM math programs for 83(+)?
>
>
> >
> > Basic isn't all that bad, for math programs, basic is often much easier
> > than asm
> >
> > > There is not even a good prime factor program, though there is a
pretty
> fast one in BASIC.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
References: