RE: A83: Ti8xcc [82/83/83+/85/86]


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: A83: Ti8xcc [82/83/83+/85/86]



I think "Professional" is the right word...

>> > 8. nearly all of TISCO is not finished, Ti8xcc is a bit more like a
>> > 'comercial' compiler.
>> 
>> Oh yeah, we need to think of ourselves as 'commerical' to get anything
>> done.  Whether or not it is 'finished' isn't what's important (in my
>> opinion), but rather the quality of the current version is what matters.

>Uhm, tell me another way to express the difference (so I could use it a
>next time). It wasn't my intention to get payed for using the compiler or
>something, just expressing the differnce between good, and 'less good'...

BTW, I'm not much of a professional , but I like the idea of getting C (my favourite language) for the lower TICalcs, so I'd like to help when I can... 


Greetings,
Peter Martijn






Warning
Could not process part with given Content-Type: application/ms-tnef