Re: A83: A problem with matrices
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: A problem with matrices
Pizza of Hut wrote:
> Thanx for the help. Now that I look at it, something like that would really
> save memory and eliminate the need for external data files. I don't understand
> how you came up with the variables you used to offset level_one, or why you
> load 5 into (level_one+row2+el3) to access (2,3). Is 5 a default value, or
> does it change depending on what element I'm trying to access? BTW, how would
> I use ix to determine what level I'm in? (I don't know a whole lote about the
> index registers yet)
you misunderstood. he just loads 5 into (2,3).. the 5 has no meaning. it is
just data.
(level_one+row2+el3) is equal to (2,3) in this example..
//Olle
References: