A83: Re: Re: SOS lite


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A83: Re: Re: SOS lite




I did use _parseinp so making a version of SOS without Basic support
wouldn't save very much memory (maybe 50 bytes).

Joe Wingbermuehle
http://www.usmo.com/~joewing/

-----Original Message-----
From: James Matthews <matthews@tkb.att.ne.jp>
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, November 05, 1998 2:38 AM
Subject: A83: Re: SOS lite


>
>Joe:
>
>Do you use _parseinp to run basic programs?  Sorry, can't be buggered to
look at the code :)...
>
>Later,
>
>James Matthews (matthews@tkb.att.ne.jp)
>
>ICQ: 7413754
>http://home.att.ne.jp/gold/tomcat21/index.html
>http://library.advanced.org/18242/
>
>----------
>> From: Roger Stone <capsterx@hotmail.com>
>> To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
>> Subject: A83: SOS lite
>> Date: Thursday, November 05, 1998 12:15 PM
>>
>>
>> Joe, have you given any consideration to releasing a lite ver of the new
>> sos (no basic support)...i know its small already, but i (and maby
>> others) have no use for basic under sos.  (is the basic done any better
>> under sos then the ti-os?)
>>
>> vod
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>