Re: A83: Re: subprogs

To: James Matthews <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: Re: subprogs
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 19:29:24 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <199807241242.VAA16064@tkb.att.ne.jp>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


On 24-Jul-98, James Matthews wrote:

>> I severly doubt the fact you can do that, at least if its from another
>> asm program.  You can of course load the basic vars via x/y and the ops,
>> but that's it.  And yeah, 300 is probably possible.. as a matter of
>> fact, you can fill the textmem, textshadow, cmdshadow with stuff.. so it
>> can be a lot more than that.. asm wise that is...
>> -Ahmed
>> 

>Ahmed is probably right.  But also to keep *track* of 300 variables would
>be a TOUGH job.  What do you need it for anyway?

>James.

What's so terribly tough with that? Never used an array of >300 items?

Linus

References:

Re: A83: Re: subprogs

From: "James Matthews" <matthews@tkb.att.ne.jp>