Re: A82: CrASH bug saga is over.........

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: CrASH bug saga is over.........
From: "Evil Sam" <evil_sam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 12:49:38 PDT
Delivered-To: assembly-82-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org


>Oh really, every time i try to get in touch 
>with crash man he never responds to emails.  
>Whats up with that.  I agree with greg on 
>the fact that crashman can be a little stuck 
>up jerk, but no one can convince me 
>otherwise until i talk to him.  I also think 
>that CrASH paved the ways for "semi-hackers" 
>to hack CrASH and ASH and OS-82, so that 
>they could create their own shell, just like 
>on the 85.  It may be good or bad, but from 
>personal experience even though there are a 
>lot of Shells only a few are used.  This 
>would be the same on the 82 as well.
>~Will
 
   If you have never communicated with CrASH_man, then how can you say 
he is a stuck up jerk? I said he was hard to get in touch with, but when 
I do get a response from him, it is always friendly. He actually looked 
at my code. I can't say the same for Barubary since the only time I ever 
have gotten a response out of him was when I reported the Nibbles bug 
(irony?). 
   Maybe you should go to the CrASH homepage and read the making of 
CrASH. You appear to have a few misconceptions.
   Sam

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com