Re: A82: Re: GWv2.0 bug/ASHv3.0 bug


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A82: Re: GWv2.0 bug/ASHv3.0 bug




On Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:32:28 EST, you wrote:

>
>In a message dated 98-02-11 18:16:55 EST, you write:
>
>> Speaking of too many shells, you may want to talk to Ben Sfarazza
>>  about Rigel (for the 85).  It uses fixed address relocation and
>>  updates the vat (i am pretty sure, anyways).
>>  
>>  -mike
>>   mgp4007@omega.uta.edu
>
>I think Usgard relocation is the best bet
>
>~Adamman
>

the Usgard method wouldn't allow for backward compatability of all of
the ash games already out there... definitely a bad idea.

-mike
 mgp4007@omega.uta.edu


References: