Re: A82: TI-82 Shell
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A82: TI-82 Shell
I have nothing to do with JASS, i have not tried and do not now what
features it has.
Jason and i are working on a shell and we have not decided what to call the
shell. We have decided not to release information on when it will be
released or what features will be included untill we have a working beta
version.
Dines
-----Original Message-----
From: Bennie R Copeland <prince.endymion@juno.com>
To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: 27. oktober 1997 06:38
Subject: Re: A82: TI-82 Shell
>JASS is your combined efforts isnt it? when will a final version be out?
>
>On Sun, 26 Oct 1997 11:15:22 +0100 "Dines Justesen"
><c958362@student.dtu.dk> writes:
>> Since Jason on I teamed up and decided to work on one shell it wont
>>be a
>>problem which shell the school is written for. When we release this
>>there
>>will (hopefully :) ) only be our shell and JASS (which will be kind of
>>out
>>dated).
>>
>>Dines
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bennie R Copeland <prince.endymion@juno.com>
>>To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: 26. oktober 1997 00:38
>>Subject: Re: A82: TI-82 Shell
>>
>>
>>
>>>oh well I prefer OS-82, how hard would it be to take the Ash school
>>info
>>>and convert it for OS-82?
>>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 1997 13:42:43 -0700 Matt Maurano <maurano@best.com>
>>>writes:
>>>>Dines cowrote ash, and he mentioned earlier that it'd be an ash
>>>>school.
>>>>OS-82, IMHO is falling into the grave, if it is not already buried.
>>>>Slower, bigger, and not as elegant as Ash, I never liked it. JASS is
>>>>only a compatability shell, and if Oshell and os82 are dead, so is
>>it.
>>>>
>>>>Bennie R Copeland wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ok will it be for ASH, OS-82, or JASS?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Follow-Ups: