Error! Failed to query database!
Re: If you had to destroy a calculator in a life-or-death situation, which one would it be?
|
jeremysimpkins
|
i picked 80/81/82 because i've never really held one before, but judging from the fact that they are older than the others, they may be heavier and therefore deal a more hefty blow to my enemy ;)
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 April 2005, 00:02 GMT
|
|
Re: If you had to destroy a calculator in a life-or-death situation, which one would it be?
|
anthony C
|
To be honest, if it were truely Life or Death, I would be willing to destroy any calculator. I mean, Life is more important then a calculator to me (I still love calcs though).
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 April 2005, 00:14 GMT
|
|
Re: If you had to destroy a calculator in a life-or-death situation, which one would it be?
|
Jerk
|
What about an option that says casio CFX or HP-49. I'd choose one of those instantly. Because of the lack of those options I chose chicken out and pick this b/c I would never destroy a ti calculator. While, maybe I'd burn the 73
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 April 2005, 00:47 GMT
|
|
Re: If you had to destroy a calculator in a life-or-death situation, which one would it be?
|
Morgan Davies
(Web Page)
|
If you seriously apply this to the calculators you have it would be very hard! I have 2 86's and a v200...the v200 would have to go! However if I could include my roommates crappy 83+ SE, it would be gone in a heart beat :-)
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 April 2005, 05:42 GMT
|
|
Re: If you had to destroy a calculator in a life-or-death situation, which one would it be?
|
matt zelda
|
who in the world wolud actually put 89/89Ti. there is something seriously wrong with who eva did that. seriously
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 April 2005, 18:19 GMT
|
|
1 2 3
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|